Oh! Oh! our English 31/3/2013
It was reported in See Hua Daily
News, March, 2013 there was only 30% of
the 200 teachers taking an English proficiency examination could pass. In another report there were only 2 students
scoring 2A+; 8% getting Band 4 and more than 36%
obtaining Band 3 in the latest MUET results disclosed. I am not at all surprised at the results
scored by both our English teachers and students. They are after all are what they have been ‘fed’. Thus it is expected. So don’t jeer / sneer /scoff at /condemn them
for their poor performance. I wonder
which aspects and areas they were tested.
Is the examination geared to them properly in terms of scope and relevanc?.
To me, it is nothing surprising and
upsetting. I studied in a Chinese
primary school and I only learnt English when I was in primary 3. And English proved to be so difficult and
alien to/ for me to learn at ease. Being a
restless, lazy and slow person, I did not learn it well. When I was in the secondary school, I went to
an English medium school. Except the Chinese language, all the subjects
were in English and I had a hard time for the first few years. Gradually, I got
used to the language though I still had no ideas how it worked.
Hence my English based more on the
language sense / intuition/spontaneity because I had a lot of language exposures/
experiences. I had no idea whether the sentences
were correct or not. It was because I lacked
the knowledge of the language to know them.
I had not grasped the 12 Active Tenses and 8 Passive Tenses. Besides, I also had no idea the differences
between the Active Tenses and the Passive ones.
I also could not differentiate the word in different word classes.
For example, I had no idea the
difference between the words “confidence, confident and confidently” to be used
in sentences. Can you? Let me test you now:
Fill in the blanks with the
words: confidence, confident,
confidently, confide
1. He is ___________ that he can
win in the speech competition now.
2. John did not have the
______________ to take part in the speech competition last year.
3. Now he speaks Chinese, English
and BM __________________.
4. He ___________ in me that he
really read a lot to improve his different languages.
(Decide
the tense before you attempt question 4.)
So I can say my English was in a mess
and I lacked the confidence to speak and write English .
Especially for my spoken English, I also lacked the complete information of English
speech sounds, word stress and intonation.
I did not pass my SC with credit in my Form Five English and I failed HSC Form Six English general paper. Hence it was one of my reasons to study English
as a major in the university. I started
to take my studies seriously in Form 3 because I realised the importance of
education . But I had missed out a lot
of learning for the past years being restless and lazy and for lacking of mind-focus.
When I was studying English in the
university, I really took English seriously.
I studied grammar and tried to find out how this language works. I studied quite a number of grammar books
written by different writers. I was
lucky to have come across a Taiwanese grammarian called 贺立民 who wrote a series of English grammar titled “A New English Grammar”. There are 6 grammar books with detailed
description and explanation of 8 word classes: Nouns, Pronouns, Verbs,
Adjectives, Adverbs, Conjunctions, Prepositions and Interjections. I also bought more compact one in 2 books. After going through the books written by him,
I became more / less enlightened as I got the ideas in a systematic and
holistic way though I still had a lot more to learn and confirm.
While studying there, I was once puzzled why my coursemates not acquiring as many English words as I did could beat me all the time. Soon I found out the truth. They were very and very hardworking / diligent. Besides, they were really well-versed with the English grammar. There was almost no mistake at all in their writing. They had well-trained memory and were smart in dealing with all types of questions. Moreover, they were always well-prepared for their examinations. Hence they beat me all through. I had only one strong point that I had a richer stock of vocabulary. And I could use the language in speaking and writing more fluently than they could though there were mistakes here and there. The professors marking our papers took grammatical errors harshly. Thus, I found the need to take my English grammar seriously and so I studied them critically and analytically. Gradually, learning English became one of my hobbies.
Another reason that I had to take grammar seriously because I gave English tuition and was paid well. Thus I needed to know the rules and regulations well to help my tuitees. I remember once one of my tuitees asked me why "She is dedicated to teaching" not "to teach" as the rule of "to F1". I could not explain to him based on a general rule. So I told him to remember the point that "dedicated to F2". It was only years later that I discovered the rule. It is because for ' be dedicated to ' , the 'to' here functions as a preposition so it is followed by noun / F2. I knew ' be dedicated to F2' because of my language sense. I discovered this general rule through my studies of English grammar. This awareness fostered me to gather 'verbs with to F2 and I found quite a few: ascribe to, commit to, dedicated to, devoted to, prefer to......to, resort to, be used to, .........
This interest and passion fostered me to write some grammar books to share, too. This attempt enabled me to explore, investigate and discover even more. Besides grammar, I also see the importance of English speech sounds and thus I wrote a book to deal with them. The knowledge of English speech sounds also inspired me to compile a book dealing with the Chinese speech sounds. All these efforts put me in a better position to talk about a language and to learn another new language more at ease.
While studying there, I was once puzzled why my coursemates not acquiring as many English words as I did could beat me all the time. Soon I found out the truth. They were very and very hardworking / diligent. Besides, they were really well-versed with the English grammar. There was almost no mistake at all in their writing. They had well-trained memory and were smart in dealing with all types of questions. Moreover, they were always well-prepared for their examinations. Hence they beat me all through. I had only one strong point that I had a richer stock of vocabulary. And I could use the language in speaking and writing more fluently than they could though there were mistakes here and there. The professors marking our papers took grammatical errors harshly. Thus, I found the need to take my English grammar seriously and so I studied them critically and analytically. Gradually, learning English became one of my hobbies.
Another reason that I had to take grammar seriously because I gave English tuition and was paid well. Thus I needed to know the rules and regulations well to help my tuitees. I remember once one of my tuitees asked me why "She is dedicated to teaching" not "to teach" as the rule of "to F1". I could not explain to him based on a general rule. So I told him to remember the point that "dedicated to F2". It was only years later that I discovered the rule. It is because for ' be dedicated to ' , the 'to' here functions as a preposition so it is followed by noun / F2. I knew ' be dedicated to F2' because of my language sense. I discovered this general rule through my studies of English grammar. This awareness fostered me to gather 'verbs with to F2 and I found quite a few: ascribe to, commit to, dedicated to, devoted to, prefer to......to, resort to, be used to, .........
This interest and passion fostered me to write some grammar books to share, too. This attempt enabled me to explore, investigate and discover even more. Besides grammar, I also see the importance of English speech sounds and thus I wrote a book to deal with them. The knowledge of English speech sounds also inspired me to compile a book dealing with the Chinese speech sounds. All these efforts put me in a better position to talk about a language and to learn another new language more at ease.
Now can anyone tell me if we have
good, holistic and systematic English curriculums to programme them to command
the 4 basic skills, namely, listening, speaking, reading and writing since
small. If you have no idea what good,
holistic and systematic English curriculum means, you may refer to the ones in
Singapore for reference. If you are still not sure, go to Sinpore, our small dot neighbour to find out. Then you can
understand why our teachers and students perform/ed not so well. Now do
you know whom / where you should point your gun at? You will feel fed up to hear me repeating the
same thing. Thus I leave you to ponder
on it. It is just like a mother who does
not cook proper meals for her children and thus they resort to snacks to fill
up their stomach. The English language teaching and learning has become so snacky and improper. What is the end
result?
In language learning, a learner must have enough viewings of the
texts in order to grasp the basic structures, vocabulary and speech
sounds. Besides viewing of the texts help learners cultivate the language sense/ intuition and
thus acquire the fluency of the language.
That means a learner must have enough language experiences / exposures
in width, length and depth to
acquire the language. Besides, there
must be enough drills of grammar to create the awareness of the forms and
functions of the language to ensure the correct use of the language. If a learner has acquired the fluency and accuracy in speaking and writing of the language, he can declare
that he has more / less mastered the language though language learning
especially the acquisition of English words is a life-long process.
Besides intensive learning of the
language through lessons in school, a learner must read extensively in order to build up a rich
stock of vocabulary for/to use at will.
Moreover, a learner can also gain a lot of knowledge through reading storybooks, newspapers, journals,
magazines and so on. Hence there must be a good reading programme
for learners to build up their vocabulary.
It is through reading that they are reinforced with the structures,
forms and functions of a language.
If a learner has enough language
knowledge in the forms of grammar, pronunciation, intonation, word stress,
spelling and punctuation; a rich stock
of vocabulary, well-versed with different current issues/ events / are so
knowledgeable and enough language exposures and practices, what can prevent
them to score well in any standard English proficiency examination?
But our education system leave our
teachers and students with little time for reading. Our learners, parents, teachers, principals,
the education department and the society are so obsessive with As’ results that
nobody/ very few have the patience with proper means to reach the end. Hence our students go for tuition just hoping
to improve the grade. I have come across
a Form 2 student who did 8 English workbooks in a year hoping to score
well. Therefore her learning of English was
so shallow/ superficial and fragmental. She
had no idea how to differentiate one tense from another well. Out of the 12 tenses in the active voice and
8 tenses in the passive voice, she only knew a few. She is not an exception. I bet majority of students ‘learning English’ through commercially-produced English workbooks. If you don’t believe, polling around to find
out the truth to disprove me.
Or find out how many students or English
teachers know the 12 tenses in the Active Voice and 8 tenses in the Passive
Voice in forms and functions well. Besides
they should know the forms of the verb which have both the Regular and
Irregular forms. The difference is that
for Regular forms of the verb, F3 (Simple Past) and F4 (Past Participle) are F1
(base / root form) + ed whereas the Irregular forms, F3 and F4 may have
different forms. Hence it is important
to know which verbs (less than 5%) are in the category of Irregular forms and
to know the rest to be in Regular forms.
For example:
Regular Forms of the
Verb
F1 F2 F3 F4
walk walking walked walked
talk talking talked walked
Irregular Forms of
the Verb
F1 F2 F3 F4
go going went gone
break breaking broke broken
hang hanging hung hung
12 forms of Active Tenses in
the 3 time slots: Present |Past | Future
Aspect Present Past Future
I. Simple
Tenses Simple Present Simple
Past Simple Future
i. Verb-to-be
am / is / are was / were shall/ will be
ii.
Ordinary Verb
He /She/ It F1
+s/es [S] F3 shall/
will F1
I/We/You/You/They
F1
II. Continuous
am /is/ are F2 was/ were F2 shall/ will be F2
Tenses
III. Perfect i.
Verb-to-be
Tenses have/ has been had been shall/will
have been
ii.
Ordinary Verb
have/has F4 had F4 shal/will
have F4
IV. Perfect
Continuous have/has been F2 had been F2 shall/will
have been F2
Tenses
To test their knowledge on the 12
Active Tenses, just ask them to use the verb ‘run’ / the verbs that they can construct 12 sentences
with 12 different tenses in related ways.
For example:
To use the verb ‘jog’:
I jog every day.
I am jogging in the park now
I am jogging in the park now
I have jogged for one and half an hour already.
Actually, I have been jogging since 5pm.
I shall have been jogging for 2 hours if I jog for another half an hour.
I shall have been jogging for 2 hours if I jog for another half an hour.
Yesterday, I jogged in the Sibu Square.
While I was jogging there, I saw a python.
I had jogged there for an hour when my friend, Alina called me on the handphone.
I had been jogging there since 4pm before I went to meet a friend.
I shall/ will jog in the Bukit Lima park with a group of friends tomorrow.
We shall/ will be jogging there at 5pm.
We shall have jogged 6 times this week if we go jogging tomorrow.
Did you notice that the Verb structure will tell you what tense it is? So is it important to know the forms?
8 Forms of the Passive Tenses
While I was jogging there, I saw a python.
I had jogged there for an hour when my friend, Alina called me on the handphone.
I had been jogging there since 4pm before I went to meet a friend.
I shall/ will jog in the Bukit Lima park with a group of friends tomorrow.
We shall/ will be jogging there at 5pm.
We shall have jogged 6 times this week if we go jogging tomorrow.
Did you notice that the Verb structure will tell you what tense it is? So is it important to know the forms?
8 Forms of the Passive Tenses
I. Simple Tenses (3)
1.Simple Present
Tense
The
Active Voice The
Passive Voice
[He/She/It] F1 + s/es [He
/She/ It] is F4
[I] F1 [I]
am F4
[We/You/You/They] F1 [We/You/You/They] are
F4
2. Simple Past Tense
[S]
F3 [S] was/were F4
Note: [S--Subject] === I / You / He/
She/ It (singular)
We You
/ They (plural)
3. Simple Future Tense
[I/We] shall F1 [I/We]
shall be F4
[You/You /He/She/It/They] will F1 [You/You /He/She/It/They] will be F4
Note: If the subject is [I/We], you may also use
the auxiliary verb ‘will’ especially when the
speaker/ writer expresses his/er ‘will/determination’ to do something.
II. Continuous Tenses (2)
1. Present
Continuous Tense
am/is/are F2 am/ is/ are being
F4
2. Past Continuous Tense
was / were F2 was/were being F4
III. Perfect Tenses (3)
1. Present Perfect Tense
have/has F4 have/has been F4
2. Past Perfect Tense
had F4 had
been F4
3. Future Perfect Tense
shall/will have F4 shall/will have been F4
So you see it is 12 –
4 = 8. The four tenses without the passive tense are Future
Continuous Tense and all the 3 Perfect Continuous Tenses.
Do you agree that we need to know the
forms well first before you can apply them in functions which you must have the
idea when to use each tense correctly? If
you know 12 Active Tenses and 8 Passive Tenses well, you have more / less won half of the battle to
master the grammar of the language. Do
you agree?
All in all to acquire grammar, you
need to undergo through a lot of language exposures in contexts and drill the
items in isolation. There must be enough
repetition and rehearsal to learn them in a systematic and holistic way. I can
bet on the fact that these teachers and students who did poorly not only lack
the knowledge of the language but also practices in proper ways to get on the track
to perform. This is what the linguists
say to master a language, a learner must have the competence / knowledge of the
language and being able to use the language in speaking and writing is the performance.
Language learning just like drinking and eating is life-long.
Language learning just like drinking and eating is life-long.